حذف آرسنیک از محلول لیچینگ باردار با استفاده از روش انعقاد الکتروشیمیایی

نوع مقاله : علمی و پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• سید مرتضی موسوی راد ¹
• علی حسن زاده سلبوئی ²

¹ گروه پژوهشی محیط زیست، پژوهشگاه علوم و تکنولوژی پیشرفته و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تحصیلات تکمیلی صنعتی و فناوری پیشرفته، کرمان، ایران

² معاونت امور معادن و صنایع معدنی، سازمان صنعت، معدن و تجارت استان کرمان، کرمان، ایران.

10.22067/jmme.2021.58937.0

چکیده

در مطالعه حاضر، فرآیند انعقاد الکتروشیمیایی (الکتروکواگولاسیون) در صنایع معدنی به منظور حذف یون آرسنیک از محلول لیچینگ باردار PLS)) کارخانه فرآوری مس، مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. نمونه ها حاصل از شبیه سازی فرآیند لیچینگ و با افزودن نمک آرسنیک سه ظرفیتی (NaAsO2) تهیه گردید. تأثیرات سه پارامتر مستقل مانند pH (X₁)، زمان الکترولیز (X₂)، چگالی جریان (X₃) با استفاده از روش سطح پاسخ (RSM) بمنظور بررسی حذف آرسنیک از محلول PLS، بررسی شد. این طرح شامل 17 مجموعه آزمایش با استفاده از سیستم الکتروکواگولاسیون می باشد. در این تحقیق، طرح آزمایش باکس – بنکن در روش سطح پاسخ با سه عامل عددی در سه سطح برای بررسی اثر تعاملی متغیرهای فرآیند به منظور بررسی راندمان حذف آرسنیک از محلول لیچینگ با استفاده از روش الکتروکواگولاسیون، مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. شرایط بهینه برای فرآیند الکتروکواگولاسیون در 5/6pH:، زمان الکترولیز: 114 دقیقه و چگالی جریان الکتریکی A/m² 3/65، با راندمان حذف88/96٪ حاصل شد. نتایج نشان داد که قابلیت فرآیند الکتروکواگولاسیون به عنوان یک روش قابل اعتماد و قابل اطمینان به منظور حذف یون های فلزی بخصوص یون آرسنیک از پساب های صنایع معدنی به ویژه در کارخانجات فرآوری مواد معدنی بسیار مطلوب می باشد.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

• محلول لیچینگ باردار
• انعقاد الکتروشیمیایی
• آرسنیک
• روش سطح پاسخ

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

Removal of Arsenic from Pregnant Leaching Solution Using Electrochemical Coagulation Method

نویسندگان [English]

• Seyed Morteza Moosavirad ¹
• Ali Hasanzadeh-Sablouei ²

¹ Department of Environment, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.

² Deputy Minister of Mines and Mining Industries, Industry, Mining and Trade Organization of Kerman Province, Kerman, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In the present study, the electrochemical coagulation process (electrocoagulation) in the mining industry to remove arsenic ions from the charged leaching solution of PLS (copper processing plant) has been investigated. Samples were obtained by simulating the leaching process by adding trivalent arsenic salt (NaAsO₂). The effects of three independent parameters such as pH (X₁), electrolysis time (X₂), current density (X₃) were investigated using the response surface methodology (RSM) to investigate the removal of arsenic from PLS solution. This design includes 17 sets of experiments using electrocoagulation system. In this study, the Box-Benken test design in the response surface method with three numerical factors at three levels was investigated to investigate the interactive effect of process variables to evaluate the efficiency of arsenic removal from leaching solution using electrocoagulation method. The optimal conditions for the electrocoagulation process were determined at pH 6.50, electrolysis time: 114 minutes and electric current density of 65.3 A/m², with a removal efficiency of 96.88%. The results showed that the ability of electrocoagulation process as a reliable method to remove metal ions, especially arsenic ions from the effluents of the mining industry, especially in mineral processing plants is very desirable.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Pregnant Leaching Solution
• Electrochemical Coagulation
• Arsenic
• Response Surface Methodology

مراجع

1. Smedley, P. L. and Kinniburgh, D.G.A., "Review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters", Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 17, NO. 3, pp. 517-568, (2002).
2. Singh, N., Kumar, D. and Sahu, A., "Arsenic in the environment: Effects on human health and possible prevention", Journal of Environmental Biology, Vol. 28, pp. 359-365, (2007).
3. Karim, M. M., "Arsenic in groundwater and health problems in Bangladesh", Water Research, Vol. 34, pp. 304-310, (2000).
4. Ravenscroft P., Brammer H. and Richards K., "Arsenic Pollution: A Global Synthesis, RGS-IBG Book Series", A John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Publication, London, (2009).
5. WHO (The World Health Organization), "Arsenic in Drinking-Water, Background Document for Development of WHO guidelines for Drinking Water Quality", Geneva, (2003).
6. US-EPA (United States-Environmental Protection Agency), "EPA to Implement 10 ppb Standard for Arsenic in Drinking Water", Office of Water. Fact Sheet. EPA 815-F-01-010, (2001).
7. El-Samrani, A.G., Lartiges, B.S. and Villieras, F., "Chemical coagulation of combined. sewer overflow: heavy metal removal and treatment optimization", Water Research, 42, pp. 951-960, (2008).
8. da-Silva, L. F., Barbosa, A. D., de Paula, M., Romualdo, L. L. and Andrade, L. S., "Treatment of paint manufacturing wastewater by coagulation/electrochemical methods: proposals for disposal and/or reuse of treated water", Water Research, Vol. 101, pp. 467-475, (2016).
9. Zhu, Q. and Li, Z., "Hydrogel-supported nanosized hydrous manganese dioxide: synthesis, characterization, and adsorption behavior study for Pb²⁺, Cu²⁺, Cd²⁺ and Ni²⁺ removal from water", Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 281, pp. 69-80, (2015).
10. Víctor-Ortega, M. D., Ochando-Pulido, J. M. and Martínez-Ferez, A., "Thermodynamic and kinetic studies on iron removal by means of a novel strong-acid cation exchange resin for olive mill effluent reclamation", Ecological Engineering, 86, pp. 53-59, (2016).
11. Mosikatsia, B., Mabubaa, N. and Malingaa, S. P., "Thin film composite membranes consisting of hyperbranched polyethylenimine (HPEI) cysteamine layer for cadmium removal in water", Journal of Water Process Engineering, Vol. 30, pp. 100686, (2019).
12. Ozaki, H., Sharma, K. and Saktaywin, W., "Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters", Desalination, 144, pp. 287-294, (2002).
13. Kurniawan, T. A., Chan, G. Y. S., Lo, W.H. and Babel, S., "Physicoechemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals", Chemical Engineering Journal, 118, pp. 83-98, (2006).
14. Kobya, M., Sık, E., Oncel, M., S. Demirbas, E., Goren, A., Y. Akyol A. and Yildirim, Y., "Removal of low concentration of As(V) from groundwater using an air injected electrocoagulation reactor with iron ball anodes: RSM modeling and optimization", Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science, Special issue, 1, pp. 2147-3781, (2014).
15. Sık, E., Kobya, M., Demirbas, E., Oncel, M. S. and Goren, A. Y., "Removal of As(V) from groundwater by a new electrocoagulation reactor using Fe ball anodes: optimization of operating parameters", Desalination and Water Treatment, 56, pp. 1177-1190, (2015).
16. Holt, P., Barton, G. and Mitchell, C., "The future for electrocoagulation as a localized water treatment technology", Chemosphere, 59, pp. 355-367, (2005).
17. Linares-Hernández, I., Barrera-Díaz, C., Roa-Morales, G., Bilyeu, B. and Ureña-Núñez, F., "Influence of the anodic material on electrocoagulation performance", Chemical Engineering Journal, 148, pp. 97-105, (2009).
18. Gomes, J. A., Rahman, M. S., Das, K., Varma, S. and Cocke, D. A., "Comparative electrochemical study on arsenic removal using iron, aluminum, and copper electrodes", ECS Transactions, 25, pp. 59-68, (2010).
19. Wan, W., Pepping, T. J., Banerji, T., Chaudhari, S. and Giammar, D. E., "Effects of water chemistry on arsenic removal from drinking water by electrocoagulation", Water Research, 45, pp. 384-392, (2011).
20. Emamjomeh, M. M. and Sivakumar, M., "Review of pollutants removed by electrocoagulation and electrocoagulation/flotation processes", Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 1663-1679, (2009).
21. Song, P., Yang, Z., Xu, H., Huang, J., Yang, X. and Wang, L., "Investigation of influencing factors and mechanism of antimony and arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using Fe-Al electrodes", Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 53, pp. 12911-12919, (2014).
22. Li, L., van Genuchten, C. M., Addy, S. E., Yao, J., Gao, N. and Gadgil, A. J., "Modeling As(III) oxidation and removal with iron electrocoagulation in groundwater", Environmental Science & Technology, 46, pp. 12038-12045, (2012).
23. Lakshmanan, D., Clifford, D. A. and Samanta, G., "Comparative study of arsenic removal by iron using electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation", Water Research, 44, pp. 5641-5652, (2010).
24. Hasanzadeh_Sablouei, A. and Moosavirad, S. M., "A novel approach for recovery of copper from thickener overflow: optimization of response surface, modeling and sludge study", Journal of Mining and Environment, In Press, (2019).
25. Umran, T. U. and Sadettin, E. O., "Removal of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Ni) by Electrocoagulation", International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6, (2015).
26. Ilhan, F., Apaydin, O., Kurt, U., Arslankaya, E. and Gonullu, M. T., "Treatment of leachate by electrocoagulation and electrooxidation processes", In: Third International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (ICEST), Hoston-Texas, USA, August, pp. 6–9, (2007).
27. Brahmi, K., Bouguerra, W., Hamrouni, B., Elaloui, E., Loungou, M. and Tlili, Z., "Investigation of electrocoagulation reactor design parameters effect on the removal of cadmium from synthetic and phosphate industrial wastewater", Arabian Journal of Chemistry, In Press. (2015).
28. Yaghmaeian, K., Martinez, S. S., Hoseini M. and Amiri, H., "Optimization of As(III) removal in hard water by electrocoagulation using central composite design with response surface methodology", Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp. 27827–27833, (2016).
29. Garg, K. K. and Prasad B., "Treatment of multicomponent aqueous solution of purified terephthalic acid wastewater by electrocoagulation process: Optimization of process and analysis of sludge", Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 60, pp. 383–393, (2015).
30. Sudamalla, P., Saravanan, P. and Matheswaran, M., "Optimization of operating parameters using response surface methodology for adsorption of crystal violet by activated carbon prepared from mango kernel", Sustainable Environment Research, 22, pp. 1–7, (2012).
31. Güçlüa, D., "Optimization of electrocoagulation of pistachio processing wastewaters using the response surface methodology", Desalination and Water Treatment, 54, pp. 3338–3347, (2015).
32. Chen, G. H., “Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment”, Separation and Purification Technology, 38, pp. 11-41, (2004).
33. Gomes, J. A., Daida, P., Kesmez, M., Weir, M., Moreno, H., Parga, J. R., Irwin, G., McWhinney, H., Grady, T., Peterson, E. and Cocke, D. L., “Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using combined Al–Fe electrode system and characterization of products”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 139, pp. 220–231, (2007).
34. Vasudevan, S. and Oturan, M., “Electrochemistry: As cause and cure in water pollution—An overview”, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 12, pp. 97–108, (2014).
35. Kobya, M., Ulu, F., Gebologlu, U., Demirbas, E. and Oncel, M. S., “Treatment of potable water containing low concentration of arsenic with electrocoagulation: Different connection modes and Fe–Al electrodes”, Separation and Purification Technology, 77, pp. 283–293, (2011).
36. Mollah, M. Y., Morkovsky, P., Gomes, J. A., Kesmez, M., Parga, J. and Cocke, D. L., “Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 114, pp. 199–210, (2004).
37. Parga, J. R., Cocke, D. L., Valenzuela, J.L., Gomes, J. A., Kesmez, M., Irwin, G., Moreno, H. and Weir, M., “Arsenic removal via electrocoagulation from heavy metal contaminated groundwater in La Comarca Lagunera Me´xico”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 124, pp. 247–254, (2005).
38. Yıldız, Y., Koparal, A. and Keskinler, B., “Effect of initial pH and supporting electrolyte on the treatment of water containing high concentration of humic substances by electrocoagulation”, Chemical Engineering Journal, 138, pp. 63–72, (2008).
39. Ghernaout, D., Ghernaout, B., Saiba, A., Boucherit, A. and Kellil, A., “Removal of humic acids by continuous electromagnetic treatment followed by electrocoagulation in batch using aluminium electrodes”, Desalination, 239, pp. 295–308, (2009).
40. Vasudevan, S., Lakshmi, J. and Sozhan, G., “Optimization of electrocoagulation process for the simultaneous removal of mercury, lead, and nickel from contaminated water”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 19, pp. 2734–2744, (2012).
41. Smedley, P. and Kinniburgh, D. G., “Arsenic in groundwater and the environmentt”. In:  Selinus O, editor.  Essentials of medical geology, Netherlands: Springer, (2013).
42. Ghosh, D., Medhi, C. R. and Purkait, M. K., “Treatment of fluoride containing drinking water by electrocoagulation using monopolar and bipolar electrode connections”. Chemosphere, 73, pp. 1393-1400, (2008).
43. Rincon, G. J. and La Motta, E. J., “Simultaneous removal of oil and grease, and heavy metals from artificial bilge water using electro-coagulation/flotation”, Journal of Environmental Management, 144, pp. 42-50, (2014).
44. Behbahani, M., Moghaddam, M. R. A. and Arami, M., “Techno-economical evaluation of fluoride removal by electrocoagulation process: optimization through response surface methodology”, Desalination, 271, pp. 209-218, (2011).
45. Flores, O. J., Nava, J. L., Carre~no, G., Elorza, E. and Martínez, F., “Arsenic removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation in a pre-pilot-scale continuous filter press reactor”, Chemical Engineering Science, 97, pp. 1-6, (2013).
46. Zhao, S. H., Huang, G., Cheng, G., Wang, Y. and Fua, H., “Hardness, COD and turbidity removals from produced water by electrocoagulation pretreatment prior to Reverse Osmosis membranes”, Desalination, 344, pp. 454–462, (2014).
47. Kamaraj, R., Ganesan, P., Lakshmi, J. and Vasudevan, S., "Removal of copper from water by electrocoagulation process—effect of alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC)", Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 399–412, (2012).
48. Vasudevan, S., Lakshmi, J. and Sozhan, G., "Effects of alternating and direct current in electrocoagulation process on the removal of cadmium from water", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192, 26-34, (2012).
49. Asaithambi, P., Abdul-Aziz, A. and Wan Daud, W. M. A. B., "Integrated ozone—electrocoagulation process for the removal of pollutant from industrial effluent: Optimization through response surface methodology", Chemical Engineering and Processing, 105, pp. 92–102, (2016).
50. Huda, N., Raman, A. A. A., Bello, M. M. and Ramesh, S., "Electrocoagulation treatment of raw landfill leachate using iron-based electrodes: Effects of process parameters and optimization", Journal of Environmental Management, 204, pp. 75–81, (2017).
51. Olmez, T., "The optimization of Cr (VI) reduction and removal by electrocoagulation using response surface methodology", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 16, pp. 1371–1378, (2008).
52. Xiarchos, I., Jaworska, A. and Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G., "Response surface methodology for the modelling of copper removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration", Journal of Membrane Science, 321, pp. 222–231, (2008).
53. Mu, Y., Zheng, X. J. and Yu, H. Q., "Determining optimum conditions for hydrogen production from glucose by an anaerobic culture using response surface methodology (RSM) ", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, pp. 7959–7963, (2009).
54. Acharya, S., Sharma, S. K., Chauhan, G. and Shree, D., "Statistical Optimization of Electrocoagulation Process for Removal of Nitrates Using Response Surface Methodology", Indian Chemical Engineer, 60(3), pp. 1–16, (2017).
55. Chou, W. L., Wang, C. T. and Huang, K. Y., 2009, "Effect of operating parameters on indium (III) ion removal by iron electrocoagulation and evaluation of specific energy consumption", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167, pp. 467–474,
56. Demim, S., Drouiche, N., Aouabed, A., Benayad, T., Couderchet, M. and Semsari, S., "Study of Heavy Metal Removal from Heavy Metal Mixture Using the CCD Method", Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 20, pp. 512–520, (2014).
57. Ghanim, A. N., "Application of Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Nitrate Removal from Wastewater by Electrocoagulation", International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4, pp. 1410–1416, (2013).
58. Moussa, D. T., El-Naas, M. H., Nasser, M. and Al-Marri, M. J., "A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges", Journal of Environmental Management, 186, pp. 24–41, (2017).
59. Vepsalainen, M., 2012, "Electrocoagulation in the Treatment of Industrial Waters and Wastewaters. Doctor of Science (Technology)", Lappeenranta University of Technology, Mikkeli, Finland, (2012).
60. Moosavirad, S. M., "Increasing efficiency of thickener operation in concentrate plant of iron ore mine using coagulation-flocculation", Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 4, pp. 146–154, (2017).
61. Assadi, A., Mohammadian Fazli, M., Emamjomeh M. M. and Ghasemia, M., "Optimization of lead removal by electrocoagulation from aqueous solution using response surface methodology", Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp. 9375–9382, (2015).
62. Gatsios, E., Hahladakis, J. N., and Gidarakos, E., "Optimization of electrocoagulation (EC) process for the purification of a real industrial wastewater from toxic metals", Journal of Environmental Management, 154, pp. 117–127, (2015).
63. Moosavirad, S. M., "Increasing efficiency of thickener operation in concentrate plant of iron ore mine using coagulation-flocculation", Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 4, pp. 146–154, (2017).
64. Shahnazi, A. H., Firoozi, S. and Haghshenas-Fatmehsari, D., "Arsenic removal from simulated pregnant acidic leach solution of copper converter flue dust by chemical precipitation", The 13^th Scientific Student Conference On Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, AmirKabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, (2016).