Effect of Duration of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure and T ensile properties of 1.2542 tool steel

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Department of Engineering, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran

2 Department of Materials Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Two groups of tool steel properties, namely high hardness and high toughness, are important for the performance of tool steels. Any increase in hardness occurs at the expense of reduced toughness. Deep cryogenic treatment may be used for increasing toughness, strength and hardness simultaneously. 12 sets of 1.2542 tool steel specimens that 9 of which have been deep cryogenically treated for 24, 36, and 48h at -196 oC and have been tempered for 1, 2, and 3h at 200 oC and then double deep cryogenic treatment has been done. 3 sets were selected as standard specimens (control specimens). The best results, simultaneous improvement of 13.8% in toughness, 8.5% in hardness, 26.4% in tensile strength and 23.4% in yield strength were obtained for the specimen treated at -196 oC for 36 hours and then tempered at 200 oC for 1 hour (specimen 361).

Keywords


  1. Das D., Ray K.K., Dutta A.K., “Influence of temperature of sub-zero treatments on the wear behavior of die steel”, Wear, Vol. 267, pp. 1361-1370, (2009).
  2. Darwin J.D., Mohan L.D., Nagarajan G., “Optimization of cryotreatment to maximize the wear resistance of 18% Cr martensitic stainless steel by Taguchi method”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 195, pp. 241-247, (2008).
  3. Li S., Deng L., Wu X., “The mechanism investigation of deep cryogenic treatment on high alloy martensitic steel by low frequency internal friction”, Cryogenics, Vol. 50, pp. 433–438, (2010).
  4. Bensely A., Senthilkumar D., Mohan L.D., Nagarajan G., Rajadurai A., “Effect of cryogenic treatment on tensile behavior of case carburized steel 815M17”, Materials Characterization, Vol. 58, pp. 485-491, (2007).
  5. Baldissera P., “Fatigue scatter reduction through deep cryogenic treatment on the 18NiCrMo5 carburized steel”, Materials and Design, Vol. 30, pp. 3636-3642, (2009).
  6. Hong-xiao C.H.I., Dang-shen M.A., Qi-long Y., Li-zhi W.U., Zhan-pu Z., Yong-wei W, “Effect of cryogenic Treatment on Properties of Cr8-Type Cold Work Die Steel”, International Journal of Iron and Steel Research, Vol. 17, pp. 43-46, (2010).
  7. Koneshlou M., Asl K.M., Khomamizadeh F., “Effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure, mechanical and wear behaviors of AISI H13 hot work tool steel”, Cryogenics, Vol. 51, pp. 55-61, (2011).
  8. He Y., Yang K., Qu W., Kong F., Su G., “Strengthening and toughening of a 2800-MPa grade maraging steel”, Material Letters, Vol. 56, pp. 763-769, (2002).
  9. Mehtedi M.E., Ricci P., Drudi L., Mohtadi S.E., Cabibbo M., Spigarelli S., “Analysis of the effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on the hardness and microstructure of X30 CrMoN 151 steel”, Materials and Design, Vol. 33, pp. 136-44, (2012).
  10. Das D., Ray K.K., “Structure-property correlation of sub-zero treated AISI D2 steel”, Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 541, pp. 45-60, (2012).
  11. Wegst C.W., “Key to Steel“, Wegst GMBH, Germany, pp. 125, (1989).
  12. Amini K., Nategh S., Shafyei A., “Influence of different cryotreatments on tribological behavior of 80CrMo12 5 cold work tool steel”, Materials and Design, Vol. 31, pp. 4666-4675, (2012).
  13. Oppenkowski A., Weber S., Theisen W., “Evaluation of factors influencing deep cryogenic treatment that affect the properties of tool steels”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 210, pp. 1949-1955, (2010).
  14. Akhbarizadeh A., Golozar M.A., Shafeie A., Kholghy M., “Effects of austenizing time on wear behavior of D6 tool steel after deep cryogenic treatment”, Journal of Iron and Steel Research, Vol. 16, pp. 29-32, (2009).
  15. Farhani F., Niaki K.S., “A Programmable System for Treatment of Alloy Steels at Cryogenic Temperatures”, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 264-265, pp. 1240-1245, (2011).
  16. BS EN 10002–1, “Metallic materials tensile testing, Part 1: method of test at ambient temperature”, British Standards Institution, (2001).
  17. Dieter GE., “Mechanical Behavior under tensile and compressive loads”, ASM Handbook, Vol. 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, Ohio: ASM international, pp. 5 and pp. 100-103, (2000).
  18. Vermeulen W.G., Morris P.F., De Weijer A.P., Van Der Zwaag S., “Prediction of martensite start temperature using artificial neural networking”, Ironmaking and Steelmaking, Vol. 23, Issue 5, pp. 433-437, (1996).
  19. Cullity B.D., “Elements of X-ray Diffraction”, 2nd ed.,, London, England: Addison-Wesley publishing company, pp. 555, (1978).
  20. Li S., Deng L., Wu X., Wang H., Min Y., Min N., “Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on internal friction behaviors of cold work die steel and their experimental explanation by coupling model”, Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 527, pp. 7950-7954, (2010).
  21. Tyshchenko A.I., Theisen W., Oppenkowski A., Siebert S., Razumov O.N., Skoblik A.P., Sirosh V.A., Petrov Y.N., Gavriljuk V.G., “Low-temperature martensitic transformation and deep cryogenic treatment of a tool steel”, Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 527, pp. 7027–7039, (2010).
  22. Hao-huai L., Wang J., Bao-luo S., Hong-shan Y., Sheng-ji G., Si-jiu H., “Effects of deep cryogenic treatment on property of 3Cr13Mo1V1.5 high chromium cast iron”, Materials and Design, Vol. 28, pp. 1059-1064, (2007).
  23. Porter D.A., Easterling, K.E., “Phase transformation in metals and alloys”, 3rd edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Ltd. (UK), England, pp.315-316, (1983).
CAPTCHA Image